Comware

 View Only
Expand all | Collapse all

acl applying problem in layer 3 switch 4500

This thread has been viewed 1 times
  • 1.  acl applying problem in layer 3 switch 4500

    Posted Feb 15, 2011 03:26 AM

    [SwRtr_4500-26]packet-filter vlan 4 outbound ip-group 3011
     Applying Acl 3011 rule 11 failed!  Reason: Resource unavailable!(Ethernet1/0/1)
     Applying Acl 3011 rule 11 failed!  Reason: Resource unavailable!(Ethernet1/0/19
    )
     Applying Acl 3011 rule 11 failed!  Reason: Resource unavailable!(Ethernet1/0/20
    )
     Applying Acl 3011 rule 11 failed!  Reason: Resource unavailable!(Ethernet1/0/21
    )
     Applying Acl 3011 rule 11 failed!  Reason: Resource unavailable!(Ethernet1/0/22
    )
     Applying Acl 3011 rule 11 failed!  Reason: Resource unavailable!(Ethernet1/0/23
    )
     Applying Acl 3011 rule 11 failed!  Reason: Resource unavailable!(Ethernet1/0/24
    )
     Applying Acl 3011 rule 11 failed!  Reason: Resource unavailable!(GigabitEtherne
    t1/0/25)
     Applying Acl 3011 rule 8 failed!  Reason: Resource unavailable!(GigabitEthernet
    1/0/26)
     Applying Acl 3011 rule 9 failed!  Reason: Resource unavailable!(GigabitEthernet
    1/0/26)
     Applying Acl 3011 rule 10 failed!  Reason: Resource unavailable!(GigabitEtherne
    t1/0/26)
     Applying Acl 3011 rule 11 failed!  Reason: Resource unavailable!(GigabitEtherne
    t1/0/26)

     

    P.S. This thread has been moved from ProCurve / ProVision-Based to Comware-Based. -HP Forum Moderator



  • 2.  RE: acl applying problem in layer 3 switch 4500

    Posted Feb 16, 2011 05:30 AM
    What is the outcome of:

    display drv-module qacl qacl_resource ?


  • 3.  RE: acl applying problem in layer 3 switch 4500

    Posted Feb 16, 2011 05:57 AM

    [4500]display drv qacl_resource
            block   used-mask  used-rule spare-mask  spare-rule
             0         16                      65                0                   191
             1         11                      56                5                   200
             2         11                      56                5                   200
             6         10                      27                6                   101
             7         10                      27                6                   101
             8         10                      27                6                   101
             9         10                      27                6                   101



  • 4.  RE: acl applying problem in layer 3 switch 4500

    Posted Feb 16, 2011 07:29 AM

    Well i am no 3com/HP expert but It seems that your ACL's are using more resources then your switch can handle. As you can see BLOCK 0 has a spare-mask value of 0. How does this work?

     

    Block 0 is used by FE ports 1/0/1 to 1/0/8

    Block 1 is used by FE ports 1/0/9 to 1/0/16

    Block 2 is used by FE ports 1/0/17 to 1/0/24

    Block 6 is used by GE port 1/0/25

    Block 7 is used by GE port 1/0/26

    Block 8 is used by GE port 1/0/27

    Block 9 is used by GE port 1/0/28

     

    This means port 1 to 8 can not be configured by acl's that use mask values (seems you are using one in acl nr 3011 rule11 on e 1/0/1).......well you get the picture for the other error messages..

    So what to do ? you can take a look to lower the number of ACL's or you'll have to buy a switch that can handle more acl's (the 5500 also uses 16 masks and 256 rules maximum)..Maybe an HP guy can tell you which one you need

     

    hope it helps

    richard



  • 5.  RE: acl applying problem in layer 3 switch 4500

    Posted Feb 17, 2011 02:01 AM

    Could you pls explain with example what is used_mask ?



  • 6.  RE: acl applying problem in layer 3 switch 4500

    Posted Feb 17, 2011 02:27 AM

    can you post rule 11 of acl 3011 ?



  • 7.  RE: acl applying problem in layer 3 switch 4500

    Posted Feb 17, 2011 03:15 AM

    rule 11 permit icmp



  • 8.  RE: acl applying problem in layer 3 switch 4500

    Posted Feb 17, 2011 04:06 AM

    rule 11 permit icmp actually converts to rule 11 permit any any

     

    From URL below : The source/source-wildcard of 0.0.0.0/255.255.255.255 means "any".

     

    This is called a mask. You can read more here :

     

    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/secursw/ps1018/products_tech_note09186a00800a5b9a.shtml

     

    regards

    richard



  • 9.  RE: acl applying problem in layer 3 switch 4500

    Posted Feb 17, 2011 04:10 AM

    you mean to say wild card mask?



  • 10.  RE: acl applying problem in layer 3 switch 4500

    Posted Feb 17, 2011 04:10 AM
    yups