Hi,
I am currently trying to understand the general traffic flow within a cluster. I could see that APs build the typical 4 tunnels (AAC/S-AAC/UAC/S-UAC) and that the UAC tunnel is build per BSSID as well as only one tunnel for each client connected to said SSID.
However I was just troubleshooting a situation where a controller uplink was saturated. I checked the client/AP distribution in the cluster and saw this.
Cluster Load Distribution for APs
---------------------------------
Type IPv4 Address Active APs Standby APs
---- --------------- -------------- ---------------
self x.x.x.x 30 69
peer y.y.y.y 69 30
Total: Active APs 99 Standby APs 99
Cluster Load Distribution for Clients
-------------------------------------
Type IPv4 Address Active Clients Standby Clients
---- --------------- -------------- ---------------
self x.x.x.x 20 1219
peer y.y.y.y 1220 20
The cluster balancing settings were left to default, which at least explains why it did not put effort in rebalancing them. I don't understand why it did not do the initial 1% balancing.
This is the bucket map for the ESSID. It is an 80:20 split for reason I did not yet find out.
Active Map[0-31] 01 01 01 01 01 00 01 01 00 01 01 01 01 00 01 01 00 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 00 00 01 00 01 01 01 01
Active Map[32-63] 01 00 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 00 00 01 01 01 01 00 01 01 01 01 00 01 01 01 01 01 01 00 01
Active Map[64-95] 01 00 01 00 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 00 00 01 00 00 01 01 01 01 01 00 01 01 01
Active Map[96-127] 01 00 01 01 00 01 01 00 00 01 01 00 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 00 01 00 01 01 01 00 01 01
Active Map[128-159] 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 00 01 01 00 01 01 01 01 00 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 00 01 01 01 00 01 01 01 01
Active Map[160-191] 01 00 01 01 01 01 01 00 01 01 01 01 00 01 01 01 00 01 01 01 00 01 01 01 00 01 01 01 01 01 00 01
Active Map[192-223] 01 01 01 01 01 01 00 01 00 01 01 01 01 01 01 00 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 00 00 01 01 01 01 01 01
Active Map[224-255] 00 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 00 01 00 01 01 01 01 01 00 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 00 01 01 01 00 00 01
Standby Map[0-31] 00 00 00 00 00 01 00 00 01 00 00 00 00 01 00 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 01 01 00 01 00 00 00 00
Standby Map[32-63] 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 01 01 00 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 01 00
Standby Map[64-95] 00 01 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 01 01 00 01 01 00 00 00 00 00 01 00 00 00
Standby Map[96-127] 00 01 00 00 01 00 00 01 01 00 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 01 00 01 00 00 00 01 00 00
Standby Map[128-159] 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 01 00 00 01 00 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 00
Standby Map[160-191] 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 01 00
Standby Map[192-223] 00 00 00 00 00 00 01 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 01 01 00 00 00 00 00 00
Standby Map[224-255] 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 01 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 01 01 00
None of those however explain how it is possible that the seemingly less utilized controller had a saturated uplink. That is why I want to understand the traffic flow between cluster members.
Does anyone know more details?
Thanks in advance