Hi community,
When we migrated a clearpass cluster last week, the edge switches temporarily only connected to the secondary clearpass node as configured in the edge switches. We discovered that failover to the secondary clearpass node did not work properly and that the 802.1x clients received EAP-TLS Timouts.
This week i test the senario on one edgeswitch to find out why the switch configuration is not properly using its second radius server.
Tested switches:
- Aruba 2530 firmware 16.09.0002 and latest 16.09.0012
- Aruba 2930M firmware 16.09.0002
When fake the IP of the first radius server, the second node give only eap-tls timeout issues. When just configure one radius server cppm01 or cppm02 in the switch configuration, all works fine.
radius-server host 192.168.1.1 key ""
radius-server host 192.168.1.1 dyn-authorization
radius-server host 192.168.1.1 time-window 0
radius-server host 192.168.1.10 key ""
radius-server host 192.168.1.10 dyn-authorization
radius-server host 192.168.1.10 time-window 0
When do a show radius on the 2530 there is no "*" marked for the dead radius server.
When do a show radius on the 2930m there is a "*"marked for both server, while only the first one is faked/unreachable.
EDGESWITCH(config)# show radius
Status and Counters - General RADIUS Information
Dead RADIUS server are preceded by *
Deadtime (minutes) : 10 TLS Dead Time (minutes) : 0
Timeout (seconds) : 5 TLS Timeout (seconds) : 30
Retransmit Attempts : 3 TLS Connection Timeout (seconds) : 30
Global Encryption Key :
Dynamic Authorization UDP Port : 3799
Source IP Selection : Outgoing Interface
Tracking : Disabled
Request Packet Count : 3
Track Dead Servers Only : Disabled
Tracking Period (seconds) : 300
ClearPass Identity :
Auth Acct DM/ Time |
Server IP Addr Port Port CoA Window | Encryption Key OOBM
--------------- ----- ----- --- ------ + ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----
*192.168.1.1 1812 1813 Yes 0 | "" No
*192.168.1.10 1812 1813 Yes 0 | "" No
Somebody familair with this issue?