Wireless Access

 View Only

Redundancy architecture poll

This thread has been viewed 2 times
  • 1.  Redundancy architecture poll

    Posted Oct 30, 2018 10:56 AM

    Hello all,

     

    I would like to hear your opinion (based on real experienced/practice on the field) in regards to redundancy architecture.  I have two local controllers in every office and a centralized Mobility Master running 8.2 code.  The AP count varies from office to office, small office would have an average of 16 APs, and a large office a max of 110 APs.  Given the scenario above, an Active/Standby or Cluster configuration would be better?  Not only to consider fast recover times in case of a controller failure, but also configuration simplicity and “future” troubleshooting – what architecture would have the advantage?    

     

    Thank you in advance for your replies.