I responded on the Youtube video as well:
Q: "Re: the 2 x VIPs. What is the benefit of specifying ClearPass VIPs on a NAD (Mobility Controller for example) opposed to the unique pub/sub IPs themselves. Is it a case of the ClearPass UCARP failover being more efficient than the built-in Mobility Controller dead server detection mechanics?"
My answer: "That is in summary what it is. If the switch/MC does not need to detect a dead server there is no delay, and it is done for all your switches and MC at once. Also, for a reboot/upgrade, the VIP will be brought down pro-actively, resulting in seamless failover. But as mentioned in the video (I think that I mentioned), the difference is probably small in practice and also subject to personal preference rather than a generally agreed on 'must do'. Using external load balancers probably is even better."
------------------------------
Herman Robers
------------------------
If you have urgent issues, always contact your Aruba partner, distributor, or Aruba TAC Support. Check
https://www.arubanetworks.com/support-services/contact-support/ for how to contact Aruba TAC. Any opinions expressed here are solely my own and not necessarily that of Hewlett Packard Enterprise or Aruba Networks.
In case your problem is solved, please invest the time to post a follow-up with the information on how you solved it. Others can benefit from that.
------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: Jan 12, 2022 01:33 AM
From: Brett Verney
Subject: CPPM Virtual IP for Captive Portal and RADIUS?
And old thread I know...
But Herman now suggests doing exactly what you have proposed - creating 2 x VIPs within ClearPass, and specify both with the NADs.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yUTZcDwaEvM
He explains why in the video, but it's still not 100% clear to me.
Anyone?
------------------------------
Regards,
Brett V
------------------------------