Hello, I am new to airheads and have a question.
Background:
I am working on a project at a college sports venue. The network was installed a year ago by a different vendor but the college and network management company has asked for help - they have not taken the network live at a major event yet. Saturday the university is going to turn up the network during a game for the first time.
There are 244 total Aps (approx 50 AP105 and 190 AP175s)
They have two D607 ANT on each AP175
Original setup
1-6000
1- M3 blade with 600 licenses
Current
1- 6000
2- M3 with 300 licenses on each blade
The 6000 is had just one M3 blade but while working with them I found another M3 blade literally laying in the dirt underneath some bleachers at the stadium.
I have installed the additional M3 and transfered half the licenses to it.
The client isnt interested in purchasing an addtional controller to run a master and two local controllers (this may change but for now this is the status quo.)
Goal:
The client wants to use the extra user capacity on the additional M3.
Question:
What is the best deployment model in my current situation that would best allow the user capacity on both m3 controllers?
Master/Local - All APs on local?
Master/Local - Share APs between - I know this isnt advisable but in my situation it could be the best option. (if it is an option I haven't tried this or tested it)
Master/Master (active/passive) - have ruled out this option for now
Thanks,
Phil Taul
phil@taul.me