1.Thanks!
>2. The No line means that the port in question has no
>association whatsoever with that VLAN.
Yes, but this seems to be expressed twice for some reason, for example from VLAN1 config:
VLAN1
untagged a1-a4,a6-a24
no untagged a5
VLAN 10
untagged a5
Perhaps it does not matter, but I am just curious why VLAN1 must have the "no"-line, when the line above already excludes port a5?
3. Thanks!
>4. VLANs are virtual broadcast domains.
>When VLANs are configured on a switch, the
>switch maintains a separate forwarding table
>for each VLAN. As long as a5 is not a member
>(tagged or untagged) of VLAN20, the frame will be dropped
So there is not the risk that a malicous user could create a faked tagged VLAN frame (with say vlan id 20) and send it through some random port (untagged for VLAN10) and the switch would strip the VLAN tag and put it into the other VLAN (20)?
>5. VLAN 1 is the default VLAN, saying that when the
>switch is delivered all the ports are untagged
>members of the default VLAN1, removing untagged member
>from VLAN1 is not applicable If an administrator wants
>to delete a VLAN, the administrator should first
>reassign each port that is an untagged member of
>the VLAN to another VLAN.
I have tried to first move all ports to other VLANs, but when trying to execute the command "no vlan 1" I get the response that primary vlan can not be removed. Can I change which vlan is the "primary"?
What is by the way the primary VLAN? :)
And, one more VLAN question! Every switch has a certain number of supported VLANs (like 256 or 2048) and I have noticed that this number can be lowered with the command max-vlans - which also makes the switch reboot.
Why would you do this? Even if you just will use 25 different vlan, what advantages would you get with a lower number of supported vlans - from 256 to 50 for example.